Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
 
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegister  
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP. (Read 183183 times)
Armenius
Master Member
*****
Offline


Inveterate Tinkerer

Posts: 541
Filthydelphia
Gender: male
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #15 - Sep 27th, 2009 at 2:03pm
 
The last 5 Posts were moved here from Ammunition by Armenius.
Back to top
 

"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read."
-Groucho Marx
 
IP Logged
 
Dibs50
Newbie
*
Offline


Proud Firearm Supporter

Posts: 16
The Live Free or Die State (NH
Gender: male
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #16 - Sep 28th, 2009 at 9:35am
 
I think that there are many valid points discussed. That said, here's my .02 worth.

First and foremost is reliability. The defense round that you choose should work every time all of the time. It makes no sense loading up with the latest greatest super JHP +P round if it won't work or jams "sometimes".

In general, the jhp will be a better performer than the ball due to it's expansion capabilities. There was some discussion of jhp for summer and fmj for winter. I assume that has to do with the assuption that the hollow point will become clogged with material (such as a winter jacket) essentially making it a fmj.

My opinion is to stick with the jhp year round. If the hollowpoint gets plugged, so be it. That said, if you cannot find a jhp that can reliably function in your pistol, you may need to go with ball. The other option you have is to use a load from Corbon called "Powrball". Powrball has a polymer ball in the hollow point that makes it function more like a ball but the ball helps the bullet expand like a jhp. Powrball is expensive at over $1 per round. You may say that is too much. When I'm buying something that may save my hide, I always ask "What is my life worth?"

Lastly, I haven't heard anyone address the issue of over- penetration. Yes, I know this is a .380. But, there is always the possibility of a shoot through. This is MUCH more common with ball ammunition. While I believe that there is sufficient evidence to support that the ball won't work as well as the jhp, the BIG concern with the shoot through is that you may hit an innocent on the other side of your target. Remember, when you shoot in self defense, it's like there is an attorney attached to every bullet that you shoot. I don't like it but that's the reality these days.

Too many focus on a "magic bullet" and disregard the need for shot placement and training. The need to train with a knowledgeable instructor is paramount. Practice does not make perfect. Perfect practice makes perfect. If you learn or pick up bad habits and practice them, you're not helping yourself. Personally, I've trained under John Farnam and find him to be very thoughtful and practical. Not a lot of bells and whistles. Just a solid foundation.

I see it as:
1) Reliable gun/cartridge
2) Shot placement

Good luck!


Back to top
 

For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realm
 
IP Logged
 
PX
Senior Member
****
Offline


"Laus Deo"

Posts: 218
Gender: male
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #17 - Sep 28th, 2009 at 11:24am
 
JMOfartO:

I would echo what Dibs50 said in his first statement..

RELIABILITY....

I know the age old argument  of "expansion" vs "penetration" and I'm of the opinion that IF you have a particular round that works for you it really doesn't matter much if that round is a jhp or fmj in a close up personal encounter such as we all fear..

My thinking (probably incorrect, but I'm old and opinionated and facts sway me very little) is that FOR MY NEEDS any self defense shooting will be very close up and IF the cavity in the nose of my jhp round of choice (Speer Gold Dot jhp's feed like corn thru a goose in my LWS380) gets clogged up with debris from any outer garment it will then just magically transform into a fmj round and go on about it's business.

Or, my first, second and probably 3rd priority in my self defense weapon is RELIABILITY, and everything else is of lesser concern.

In the first place most "knowledgeable" gun "experts" will tell you that a 380 round is basically worthless for self defense anyway, and anything less than a 45ACP round is just designed to upset (can't say "piss off" ) the shootee..

And to those esteemed experts I say I've yet to find a way to successfully, comfortably, and realistically conceal carry a 45ACP on my small frame.  Add the heat and humidity factor here in S.E. Ga. and it's simply not a choice, for me.

Hey, I have one, a very nice (imo) CS45 and if I plan to drive thru any neighborhoods or areas who's streets are named for a deceased Baptist preacher I try and bring it along..  But without an outer garment (shirt/coat/etc.) it STILL cannot be carried concealed.

I CAN take my Seecamp LWS380 anyplace, anytime, with none the wiser, and in complete comfort. 

I'm not a brain surgeon and do not profess to have any skills in rocket science, but I DO believe that 7 380cal. Gold Dot jhp's available in my pocket are worth much more than the 7 flying ashtray rounds in my CS45 back at home..

I would suggest you find a good self defense round that works reliably in your weapon of choice and go about your business.  JHP/FMJ?  Just a toss-up as far as I'm concerned.  I cannot use fmj's in my Seecamp anyway, but if I had the choice I think I'd still stick to jhp's.

I'm a big believer that having a reliable pistol of ANY caliber on you when needed is light years better than not..

With my small caliber self defense weapons I practice from 3 yards, max...  If you shoot someone from further out you open yourself up for criticism from those who would say you should have retreated rather than firing.. 

Most of regular folks (non leo's) will never have to shoot someone in defense of our lives.  IF and when we do tho, it will probably happen very quickly, from very close up and if you are very, very lucky you might have time to just pull your weapon out, point it in the general direction of the threat and pull the trigger..

It'll be strictly "point and shoot" and if you have lots of practice from close up and personal range it just offer you the skill of actually hitting what you are being threatened by.

Generally in such a situation regular folks need a little luck, and an absence of "Murphy's Lsws" to come out a winner. 

But simply HAVING a weapon available puts you heads and heels ahead of those folks who love a "cocked and locked" 45ACP choice, but had to leave it at home, or in the car.

Just personal opinion, no offense intended to anyone, and sorry to ramble, but it's what I do.  Smiley

Best Wishes,

Jesse

...

Back to top
 

"Don't Cry because it's over, Smile because it happened"....
 
IP Logged
 
Gentleman Jim
Newbie
*
Offline


Proud Firearm Supporter

Posts: 14
Indiana
Gender: male
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #18 - Oct 4th, 2009 at 7:47am
 
I usually carry Hornady JHP's (not Critical Defense) in my backup KT P3AT for the following reasons.

Most .380 JHP tests that I have seen show the round penetrating 7 - 10 inches in gelatin if the round expands like it is supposed to.

FMJ penetrates better but there is the possibility of over-penetration.  Also, FMJ just doesn't seem to disrupt as much of the surrounding gelatin as JHP.

I chose the Hornady round because although it is a hollowpoint it usually expands only slightly and still penetrates 12-16 inches.

Disclaimer:  I'n no expert and I'm not recommending this particular round, I'm just relating how I ended up making the choice I did.

Jim
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dr. Bruce Eimer
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


NRA Certified Law Enforcement
Firearms Instructor

Posts: 885
Philadelphia, PA
Gender: male
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #19 - Oct 19th, 2009 at 2:41pm
 
Armenius mentioned some good JHP loads. But, IMO, you also, with .32 acp AND with .380 acp, cannot go wrong with ball FMJ which will give you more penetration with these less than .38 special and 9mm loads.
Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
old codger
Senior Member
****
Offline


PROUD RIGHT WING EXTREMIST

Posts: 401
Oregon
Gender: male
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #20 - Oct 20th, 2009 at 8:44pm
 
You know I really don't want to sound like an expert, cause I'm sure not one.  But I been there and done that.   I've been forced to witness more then one autopsy and see the damage done by various rounds.   And I can say with certainy never underestimate the lowly .380.  I carry a Walther .380 for over thirty years and have had to resort to its comfort and found it to be a good self defense caliber.  Even the .22 can cause a lot of damage.  The .22 has been used as an assassines (sp) round for a very long time.   I really have a problem with the socalled experts who have never done it nor been there.  Book learning doesn't make an expert.  I remember reading a blog by a forensic pathologist on this site but I can't remember where.  He gave some good insight as to which round to carry.  And as I remember the advice was to use what you practice with and know the best.  He also said that low caliber JHP could gather residue while passing through clothing thus causing the JHP to act like ball ammo.  I don't know about that.  I use Gold Dot JHP for years and found it to be very satisfactory. 
Gee now please don't think I'm putting myself out there as an expert and that my opinion is better then yours.  I have seen many gunshot wounds and have a big respect for any gun.  Don't point one at me, as I don't know what a warning is.  Enough said.
I really enjoy this site and don't want to offend anyone, if I have please accept my apologies and jump right on me.
Back to top
 

Proud American Constitutionalist
Don't Tread On Me 
IN GOD WE TRUST
 
IP Logged
 
Dr. Bruce Eimer
Global Moderator
*****
Offline


NRA Certified Law Enforcement
Firearms Instructor

Posts: 885
Philadelphia, PA
Gender: male
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #21 - Oct 20th, 2009 at 9:36pm
 
old codger wrote on Oct 20th, 2009 at 8:44pm:
You know I really don't want to sound like an expert, cause I'm sure not one.  But I been there and done that.   I've been forced to witness more then one autopsy and see the damage done by various rounds.   And I can say with certainy never underestimate the lowly .380.  I carry a Walther .380 for over thirty years and have had to resort to its comfort and found it to be a good self defense caliber.  Even the .22 can cause a lot of damage.  The .22 has been used as an assassines (sp) round for a very long time.   I really have a problem with the socalled experts who have never done it nor been there.  Book learning doesn't make an expert.  I remember reading a blog by a forensic pathologist on this site but I can't remember where.  He gave some good insight as to which round to carry.  And as I remember the advice was to use what you practice with and know the best.  He also said that low caliber JHP could gather residue while passing through clothing thus causing the JHP to act like ball ammo.  I don't know about that.  I use Gold Dot JHP for years and found it to be very satisfactory. 
Gee now please don't think I'm putting myself out there as an expert and that my opinion is better then yours.  I have seen many gunshot wounds and have a big respect for any gun.  Don't point one at me, as I don't know what a warning is.  Enough said.
I really enjoy this site and don't want to offend anyone, if I have please accept my apologies and jump right on me.


I like your comments. I agree. Speaking with some experts lately has validated my contention that caliber does not make as much of a difference as the factors of bullet placement, the psychogenic shock of being shot, the mental sets of the attacker and of the defender, and the quickness and ruthlessnes of the defender's response.

Back to top
 
WWW  
IP Logged
 
old codger
Senior Member
****
Offline


PROUD RIGHT WING EXTREMIST

Posts: 401
Oregon
Gender: male
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #22 - Oct 20th, 2009 at 10:15pm
 
Bruce, you hit the nail on the head.  State of mind is the most important factor in any defense situation whether by gun or fists.  Reaction is key to winning any encounter.  And like Jesse points out 3 feet is max in most self defense situations.  And you better be mentally prepared to do the ultimate or you better run like heck. 
Gees I gotta shut my mouth before somebody think me to be a bad guy.   
Back to top
 

Proud American Constitutionalist
Don't Tread On Me 
IN GOD WE TRUST
 
IP Logged
 
Stingray
Senior Member
****
Offline


Proud Firearm Supporter

Posts: 229
Central Pennsylvania
Gender: male
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #23 - Oct 23rd, 2009 at 5:59pm
 
Dibs 50 and Old codger hit the nail on the head.
Reliability is the number one concern with ammo. in a semi-auto pistol. I fire at least 100 rounds through my carry gun and it must function each time. I have been to numerous autopsies and spoke to numerous doctors. They almost all agree that the wounds / damage they see is hard to determine caliber. You never know for sure what a bullet is going to do when you shoot someone with it and you never know what the person is going to do. If you can hit an eight inch target 5-6 times in 2 - 2 1/2 seconds from seven yards; caliber probably doesn't matter......... if you can't hit the target ....well, caliber probably still doesn't matter!
What do they say....its not the size of the dog in the fight that matters.....but the size of the fight in the dog!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
tpd223
Junior Member
**
Offline


Proud Firearm Supporter

Posts: 29
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #24 - Nov 16th, 2009 at 1:31am
 
First I'd pick whatever is most reliable in my gun, either FMJ or JHP.

In my opinion the .380 is well served by using ball ammo.  Even with ball the .380 doesn't penetrate any more than your average service caliber JHP, such as the 124gr 9mm or 180gr .40cal Gold Dots, or OO buck for that matter.  The chance of an exit on a torso hit using a .380 is very low, it simply doesn't have the horsepower for this.

Heavy clothing doesn't slow down a JHP any more than a FMJ bullet, and in many bullets the hollow point will clog and fail to expand anyway, rendering the bullet a "ball" round by default.

In testing I have conducted at our range for my job I found the only .380 JHPs that both expanded and still penetrated sufficiently to be trusted were the Gold Dot and Hornady loadings.  Both of these bullets would reliably go 11-11 1/2" in gelatin after a heavy clothing barrier, from a Kel Tec P3AT.
If my gun didn't feed these two loads well I would choose whatever FMJ bullet it worked best with, although the newer style Winchester ball in .380 has a flat point so I would likely try that first.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Blithe Cassia
Newbie
*
Offline


Proud Firearm Supporter

Posts: 2
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #25 - Nov 19th, 2009 at 1:32am
 
The FBI testing (from what I recall) suggests that the 380 falls just short of what they consider the minimum penetration necessary with HP ammo to be reliably effective. I believe they consider 12" penetration in ballistic gelatin the minimum.

One one hand, we are not the FBI. We are just typical folks. We won't be shooting through car bodies or windshields in self defense, like a cop or agent might.

On the other hand, we could use FMJ, which would probably give the adequate penetration at the expense of a smaller wound channel.

Hotter 380 loads have the same energy available as "cooler" 38 Special loads, and about the same diameter bullet. (0.355" in 380 vs. 0.358" in 38 Special)


________
"Be not the first by whom the new is tried. Nor yet the last to lay the old aside."
Womens Suits| Ladies Business Suits
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
PX
Senior Member
****
Offline


"Laus Deo"

Posts: 218
Gender: male
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #26 - Nov 19th, 2009 at 9:59am
 
RUGER357:

I'm of the opinion that it really doesn't make much difference..  I use jhp's because that's what my Seecamps are designed for. (altho the truncated fmj Winchester Q4255's work just fine for plinking)

The age old argument is "penetration" vs "expansion", and there are many folks on each side of the argument. 

I think that a quality self defense jhp in 380cal. works, and if the hollow nose gets filled with cloth or whatever the jhp will magically morph into a fmj anyway, so I just don't worry about it.

I think more time spent becoming proficient with whatever firearm you have, and knowing that choice is absolutely reliable (or as much as practicable for anything made by humans) IS something I personally worry about more than whether a choice of fmj or jhp will make much difference either way.

FMJ or JHP for self defense is a personal choice for most folks in their choice of ammo, but Larry Seecamp & his Dad have already made the choice for me... Wink

Best Wishes,

Jesse

...
Back to top
 

"Don't Cry because it's over, Smile because it happened"....
 
IP Logged
 
ProactiveShooters
Newbie
*
Offline


NRA Certified Firearms
Instructor

Posts: 16
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #27 - Feb 8th, 2010 at 12:26pm
 
FMJ is for paper

HP's are for people.
Back to top
 

Take a Proactive approach to your personal safety!

www.ProactiveShooters.com



...
WWW http://www.facebook.com/pages/Henrico-VA/Proactive  
IP Logged
 
Hardtack6
Senior Member
****
Offline


Proud Firearm Supporter

Posts: 167
Central Texas
Gender: male
Re: What is better for my .380? FMJ or HP.
Reply #28 - Feb 9th, 2010 at 1:29am
 
I've had the same question about .380 acp. I've been shooting FMJ for practice, since that's  what is available to me.  The Camp comparison was very helpful. Thanks.
Back to top
 

NRA Member
TSRA Member
US Army Veteran
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print